Reading Tip!
>To get to the fulltext easy, use the library proxy bookmarklet or activate our Pubmed url for the Get it! button!Journals
Links
Archives
- May 2022 (2)
- April 2022 (8)
- March 2022 (4)
- February 2022 (6)
- January 2022 (10)
- December 2021 (10)
- November 2021 (6)
- October 2021 (6)
- September 2021 (6)
- August 2021 (8)
- July 2021 (4)
- June 2021 (6)
- May 2021 (8)
- April 2021 (8)
- March 2021 (2)
- February 2021 (5)
- January 2021 (14)
- December 2020 (2)
- November 2020 (10)
- October 2020 (3)
- September 2020 (5)
- August 2020 (2)
- July 2020 (6)
- June 2020 (5)
- May 2020 (7)
- April 2020 (4)
- March 2020 (5)
- February 2020 (2)
- January 2020 (7)
- December 2019 (11)
- November 2019 (7)
- October 2019 (5)
- September 2019 (7)
- August 2019 (13)
- July 2019 (10)
- June 2019 (6)
- May 2019 (4)
- March 2019 (4)
- February 2019 (8)
- January 2019 (13)
- November 2018 (13)
- October 2018 (14)
- September 2018 (8)
- August 2018 (8)
- July 2018 (2)
- June 2018 (5)
- May 2018 (4)
- March 2018 (11)
- February 2018 (5)
- January 2018 (10)
- December 2017 (8)
- November 2017 (7)
- October 2017 (4)
- September 2017 (12)
- August 2017 (16)
- July 2017 (4)
- June 2017 (11)
- May 2017 (14)
- April 2017 (1)
- March 2017 (2)
- February 2017 (7)
- January 2017 (9)
- December 2016 (11)
- November 2016 (3)
- October 2016 (6)
- August 2016 (2)
- July 2016 (2)
- June 2016 (11)
- May 2016 (13)
- April 2016 (4)
- March 2016 (7)
- February 2016 (8)
- January 2016 (7)
- December 2015 (3)
- November 2015 (4)
- October 2015 (10)
- September 2015 (16)
- August 2015 (12)
- July 2015 (10)
- June 2015 (13)
- May 2015 (15)
- April 2015 (6)
- March 2015 (7)
- February 2015 (4)
- January 2015 (9)
- December 2014 (12)
- November 2014 (7)
- October 2014 (10)
- September 2014 (12)
- August 2014 (11)
- July 2014 (3)
- June 2014 (5)
- May 2014 (9)
- April 2014 (7)
- March 2014 (3)
- February 2014 (3)
- January 2014 (6)
- December 2013 (59)
- November 2013 (3)
- October 2013 (4)
- August 2013 (14)
- July 2013 (4)
- June 2013 (5)
- May 2013 (8)
- April 2013 (258)
- February 2013 (2)
- January 2013 (6)
- December 2012 (2)
- November 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (2)
- September 2012 (2)
- August 2012 (6)
- July 2012 (2)
- March 2012 (2)
- February 2012 (2)
- January 2012 (8)
- November 2011 (4)
- October 2011 (3)
- September 2011 (2)
- August 2011 (2)
- July 2011 (2)
- May 2011 (6)
- April 2011 (2)
- March 2011 (4)
- February 2011 (6)
- January 2011 (1)
- October 2010 (3)
- September 2010 (2)
- March 2010 (3)
- January 2010 (2)
- December 2009 (2)
- March 2009 (2)
- February 2009 (2)
- January 2009 (2)
- October 2008 (2)
- July 2008 (6)
- April 2008 (2)
- February 2008 (2)
- January 2008 (2)
- April 2007 (2)
- March 2007 (2)
- September 2006 (2)
- August 2006 (2)
- July 2006 (2)
- June 2006 (2)
- May 2006 (2)
- February 2006 (1)
- December 2005 (4)
- September 2005 (2)
- June 2005 (2)
- April 2005 (2)
- January 2005 (2)
- October 2004 (2)
- September 2004 (2)
- July 2004 (6)
- May 2004 (2)
- April 2004 (2)
- May 2003 (2)
- March 2003 (2)
- November 2002 (2)
- October 2001 (2)
- September 1998 (1)
- June 1998 (1)
Meta
Authors
Monthly Archives: May 2020
Adherence to Blended or Face-to-Face Smoking Cessation Treatment and Predictors of Adherence: Randomized Controlled Trial
CONCLUSIONS: This study represents one of the first attempts to thoroughly compare adherence and predictors of adherence of a blended smoking cessation treatment to an equivalent face-to-face treatment. Interestingly, although the overall adherence to both treatments appeared to be high, adherence within the blended treatment was much higher for the face-to-face mode than for the web mode. This supports the idea that in blended treatment, one mode of delivery can compensate for the weaknesses of… Continue reading
Tagged R. Sanderman
Leave a comment
Adherence to Blended or Face-to-Face Smoking Cessation Treatment and Predictors of Adherence: Randomized Controlled Trial
CONCLUSIONS: This study represents one of the first attempts to thoroughly compare adherence and predictors of adherence of a blended smoking cessation treatment to an equivalent face-to-face treatment. Interestingly, although the overall adherence to both treatments appeared to be high, adherence within the blended treatment was much higher for the face-to-face mode than for the web mode. This supports the idea that in blended treatment, one mode of delivery can compensate for the weaknesses of… Continue reading
Tagged R. Sanderman
Leave a comment
Supporting Self-Management of Cardiovascular Diseases Through Remote Monitoring Technologies: Metaethnography Review of Frameworks, Models, and Theories Used in Research and Development
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review support and exemplify the numerous possibilities in the use of frameworks, models, and theories to guide research and development of eHealth. Participatory, user-centered design, and integration with empirical evidence and theoretical modeling were widely identified principles in the literature. On the contrary, less attention has been given to the integration of implementation in the development process and supporting novel eHealth-based health care… Continue reading
Tagged R. Sanderman
Leave a comment
Supporting Self-Management of Cardiovascular Diseases Through Remote Monitoring Technologies: Metaethnography Review of Frameworks, Models, and Theories Used in Research and Development
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review support and exemplify the numerous possibilities in the use of frameworks, models, and theories to guide research and development of eHealth. Participatory, user-centered design, and integration with empirical evidence and theoretical modeling were widely identified principles in the literature. On the contrary, less attention has been given to the integration of implementation in the development process and supporting novel eHealth-based health care… Continue reading
Tagged R. Sanderman
Leave a comment
Distress and mental health care and medication use among survivors of multiple primary cancer diagnoses: Findings from the 2016 National Health Interview Survey.
 |
Related Articles |
Distress and mental health care and medication use among survivors of multiple primary cancer diagnoses: Findings from the 2016 National Health Interview Survey.
J Psychosom Res. 2020 May 11;134:110137
Authors: Andrykowski MA, Goedendorp MM
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Over 1 million survivors of multiple primary cancer (MPC) diagnoses reside in the USA. Information regarding their physical and mental health status is limited. This study examined distress and mental health care use among MPC survivors relative to survivors of a single primary cancer (SPC) diagnosis.
METHODS: Using the 2016 National Health Information Survey, MPC survivors (n = 265), SPC survivors (n = 2103), and no cancer controls (NCC; n = 28,320) were identified. The MPC group was compared to the SPC and NCC groups with regard to multiple distress indices and use of mental health care and anxiety and depression medication.
RESULTS: Relative to the SPC group, the MPC group reported more Total Distress (M = 9.59 vs. 8.84; p < .001), and were more likely to report daily or weekly anxiety feelings (OR = 2.07; p < .001), meet criteria for serious psychological distress (OR = 1.49; p = .02) and have talked to a mental health professional (OR = 1.75; p = .01). Comparison of MPC and NweCC groups yielded similar results. The MPC group did not differ from the SPC or NCC groups in severity of anxiety or depression feelings, distress interference, or anxiety and depression medication use.
CONCLUSIONS: MPC survivors reported greater distress relative to SPC survivors. The clinical significance of this greater distress is unclear, however. While MPC survivors were more likely to have talked to a mental health professional, uptake of mental health care appeared to be suboptimal. MPC and SPC survivors might be considered distinct subgroups and increased attention devoted to potentially unique mental and physical health needs of MPC survivors.
PMID: 32417691 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]
Distress and mental health care and medication use among survivors of multiple primary cancer diagnoses: Findings from the 2016 National Health Interview Survey
CONCLUSIONS: MPC survivors reported greater distress relative to SPC survivors. The clinical significance of this greater distress is unclear, however. While MPC survivors were more likely to have talked to a mental health professional, uptake of mental health care appeared to be suboptimal. MPC and SPC survivors might be considered distinct subgroups and increased attention devoted to potentially unique mental and physical health needs of MPC survivors. Continue reading
Tagged M.M. Goedendorp
Leave a comment
Distress and mental health care and medication use among survivors of multiple primary cancer diagnoses: Findings from the 2016 National Health Interview Survey
CONCLUSIONS: MPC survivors reported greater distress relative to SPC survivors. The clinical significance of this greater distress is unclear, however. While MPC survivors were more likely to have talked to a mental health professional, uptake of mental health care appeared to be suboptimal. MPC and SPC survivors might be considered distinct subgroups and increased attention devoted to potentially unique mental and physical health needs of MPC survivors. Continue reading
Tagged M.M. Goedendorp
Leave a comment