Reading Tip!
>To get to the fulltext easy, use the library proxy bookmarklet or activate our Pubmed url for the Get it! button!Journals
Links
Archives
- May 2022 (2)
- April 2022 (8)
- March 2022 (4)
- February 2022 (6)
- January 2022 (10)
- December 2021 (10)
- November 2021 (6)
- October 2021 (6)
- September 2021 (6)
- August 2021 (8)
- July 2021 (4)
- June 2021 (6)
- May 2021 (8)
- April 2021 (8)
- March 2021 (2)
- February 2021 (5)
- January 2021 (14)
- December 2020 (2)
- November 2020 (10)
- October 2020 (3)
- September 2020 (5)
- August 2020 (2)
- July 2020 (6)
- June 2020 (5)
- May 2020 (7)
- April 2020 (4)
- March 2020 (5)
- February 2020 (2)
- January 2020 (7)
- December 2019 (11)
- November 2019 (7)
- October 2019 (5)
- September 2019 (7)
- August 2019 (13)
- July 2019 (10)
- June 2019 (6)
- May 2019 (4)
- March 2019 (4)
- February 2019 (8)
- January 2019 (13)
- November 2018 (13)
- October 2018 (14)
- September 2018 (8)
- August 2018 (8)
- July 2018 (2)
- June 2018 (5)
- May 2018 (4)
- March 2018 (11)
- February 2018 (5)
- January 2018 (10)
- December 2017 (8)
- November 2017 (7)
- October 2017 (4)
- September 2017 (12)
- August 2017 (16)
- July 2017 (4)
- June 2017 (11)
- May 2017 (14)
- April 2017 (1)
- March 2017 (2)
- February 2017 (7)
- January 2017 (9)
- December 2016 (11)
- November 2016 (3)
- October 2016 (6)
- August 2016 (2)
- July 2016 (2)
- June 2016 (11)
- May 2016 (13)
- April 2016 (4)
- March 2016 (7)
- February 2016 (8)
- January 2016 (7)
- December 2015 (3)
- November 2015 (4)
- October 2015 (10)
- September 2015 (16)
- August 2015 (12)
- July 2015 (10)
- June 2015 (13)
- May 2015 (15)
- April 2015 (6)
- March 2015 (7)
- February 2015 (4)
- January 2015 (9)
- December 2014 (12)
- November 2014 (7)
- October 2014 (10)
- September 2014 (12)
- August 2014 (11)
- July 2014 (3)
- June 2014 (5)
- May 2014 (9)
- April 2014 (7)
- March 2014 (3)
- February 2014 (3)
- January 2014 (6)
- December 2013 (59)
- November 2013 (3)
- October 2013 (4)
- August 2013 (14)
- July 2013 (4)
- June 2013 (5)
- May 2013 (8)
- April 2013 (258)
- February 2013 (2)
- January 2013 (6)
- December 2012 (2)
- November 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (2)
- September 2012 (2)
- August 2012 (6)
- July 2012 (2)
- March 2012 (2)
- February 2012 (2)
- January 2012 (8)
- November 2011 (4)
- October 2011 (3)
- September 2011 (2)
- August 2011 (2)
- July 2011 (2)
- May 2011 (6)
- April 2011 (2)
- March 2011 (4)
- February 2011 (6)
- January 2011 (1)
- October 2010 (3)
- September 2010 (2)
- March 2010 (3)
- January 2010 (2)
- December 2009 (2)
- March 2009 (2)
- February 2009 (2)
- January 2009 (2)
- October 2008 (2)
- July 2008 (6)
- April 2008 (2)
- February 2008 (2)
- January 2008 (2)
- April 2007 (2)
- March 2007 (2)
- September 2006 (2)
- August 2006 (2)
- July 2006 (2)
- June 2006 (2)
- May 2006 (2)
- February 2006 (1)
- December 2005 (4)
- September 2005 (2)
- June 2005 (2)
- April 2005 (2)
- January 2005 (2)
- October 2004 (2)
- September 2004 (2)
- July 2004 (6)
- May 2004 (2)
- April 2004 (2)
- May 2003 (2)
- March 2003 (2)
- November 2002 (2)
- October 2001 (2)
- September 1998 (1)
- June 1998 (1)
Meta
Authors
Category Archives: Br J Health Psychol
Interpretations of partners’ responses to pain behaviours: Perspectives of patients and partners.
![]() |
Related Articles |
Interpretations of partners’ responses to pain behaviours: Perspectives of patients and partners.
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Nov 12;:
Authors: Akbari F, Mohammadi S, Dehghani M, Sanderman R, Hagedoorn M
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Partner’s responses to pain behaviours play a pivotal role in the patient’s adjustment. This study aims to further our knowledge regarding patients’ and partners’ interpretation of partners’ responses to pain behaviours, and the possible discrepancies between patients’ and partners’ perceptions. Further, this study examines patients’ preferred responses to pain behaviours and possible discrepancies between received and preferred responses to pain behaviours.
DESIGN: A qualitative research design based on a semi-structured in-depth interview.
METHODS: Patients with chronic low back pain and their partners (n = 54) were recruited through purposive sampling and interviewed. Data were analysed based on an inductive analytic approach.
RESULTS: Patients as well as partners indicated a number of different interpretations of partners’ responses to pain behaviours, including invalidation, relieving pain, validation, encouragement, caregiving exhaustion, and expressing resentment. Patients and partners revealed similarities in the interpretation of response categories that they associated with validation, invalidation, and expressing resentment. Discrepancies between patients and partners indicated that partners interpreted some responses as caused by caregiving exhaustion while patients did not. Patients perceived partner responses that included the active involvement of the partner (e.g., encouraging pain talk) more positively than responses that showed less active involvement of the partner.
CONCLUSION: Patients and partners are likely to make various interpretations of a certain partner response to pain behaviours. Our findings underscore that patients’ interpretation about a certain behaviour might determine whether that behaviour is rated as desirable or aversive.
PMID: 33180996 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]
Reducing discrepancies of personal goals in the context of cancer: A longitudinal study on the relation with well-being, psychological characteristics, and goal progress.
Reducing discrepancies of personal goals in the context of cancer: A longitudinal study on the relation with well-being, psychological characteristics, and goal progress.
Br J Health Psychol. 2017 Sep 27;:
Authors: Pama MR, Janse M, Sprangers MAG, Fleer J, Ranchor AV
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To (1) examine whether reducing discrepancies between goal importance and goal attainability is an adaptive predictor of well-being, (2) investigate intrusion, awareness, optimism, and pessimism as determinants of reducing discrepancies between goal importance and goal attainability, and (3) explore how goal progress is involved in reducing discrepancies between goal importance and goal attainability during two major periods after a colorectal cancer diagnosis.
DESIGN: Prospective design.
METHODS: Newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients (n = 120) were interviewed three times: within a month, 7 months (treatment period), and 18 months (follow-up period) post-diagnosis. Data were analysed using multiple regressions.
RESULTS: Results showed that (1) reducing discrepancies enhances well-being, (2) optimism and pessimism are predictors of reducing discrepancies during the treatment period but not during the follow-up period, while intrusion and awareness do not predict reducing discrepancies in either period, and (3) goal progress is a predictor of reducing discrepancies during the follow-up period, but no evidence for a moderating or mediating role of goal progress in the relation between psychological characteristics and reducing discrepancies was found.
CONCLUSIONS: Reducing discrepancies between goal importance and goal attainability could benefit colorectal cancer patients’ well-being. Optimism, pessimism, and goal progress appear to influence cancer patients’ ability to reduce discrepancies. Providing assistance in improving goal progress to those who are less optimistic and highly pessimistic may be a suitable training for cancer patients to prevent deterioration in well-being. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? More discrepancy between goal importance and goal attainability is associated with lower levels of well-being. People are able to change evaluations of importance and attainability, but it is unknown whether this positively impacts well-being. Underlying causes of differences in the extent to which discrepancies between goal importance and goal attainability are reduced are unknown. What does this study add? This is the first study to show that reducing discrepancies between goal importance and goal attainability is beneficial for well-being. This is the first study to show that optimism and pessimism are determinants of reducing discrepancies between goal importance and goal attainability. Goal progress might be an effective target for interventions that aim to facilitate one’s ability to reduce discrepancies between goal importance and goal attainability.
PMID: 28960718 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]
People with cancer use goal adjustment strategies in the first 6 months after diagnosis and tell us how.
Related Articles |
People with cancer use goal adjustment strategies in the first 6 months after diagnosis and tell us how.
Br J Health Psychol. 2015 Sep 28;
Authors: Janse M, Ranchor AV, Smink A, Sprangers MA, Fleer J
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Theory has offered suggestions on how people may adjust their personal goals after goal disturbance or altered life situations. However, the actual use of these goal adjustment strategies has rarely been studied. This study aimed to investigate whether the goal adjustment strategies identified in the literature are used in the first 6 months following a diagnosis of cancer and whether alternative strategies can be identified.
DESIGN: Exploratory design with a qualitative method of data collection.
METHODS: Patients were asked to list their current personal goals within a month after being diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Six months later, they were asked what had happened to each of these goals. For each goal, raters scored whether (1) it was achieved or being pursued as planned, (2) a known strategy was used, or (3) an alternative strategy was used.
RESULTS: Patients with colorectal cancer (n = 130) reported that more than half of their goals had been achieved or were being pursued as planned. The remaining goals (n = 210) required goal adjustment strategies. Patients used five of six known strategies that involved mostly limited adjustment. Additionally, they used combinations of goal adjustment strategies, and two alternative strategies were identified.
CONCLUSIONS: This study found that patients with cancer use goal adjustment strategies, and it provides illustrations on how these strategies are used, thus deepening and extending existing knowledge of and theory on goal adjustment. Future studies should take the newly identified strategies into account as well as the possible use of combinations of strategies. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? The successful pursuit of personal goals is important for maintaining well-being. However, an unexpected and serious illness such as cancer can lead to the need to adjust goals, either because they have become difficult or impossible to attain due to physical hindrance of the illness and/or its treatment, or because other goals have become important due to the confrontation with the fragility of life. Theories have proposed options of how people may deal with their personal goals, but whether these so-called goal adjustment strategies are actually used by cancer patients, and whether there are alternative strategies we need to take into account, is still unclear. What does this study add? This study employs a qualitative method of data collection to study what actually happens to cancer patients’ goals during the first 6 months after diagnosis. This study found that almost all goal adjustment strategies from theory are indeed used by cancer patients and that they mostly use strategies which involve only limited adjustment and a continued focus on the original goal. We found that patients with cancer use combinations of strategies and two alternative strategies, thereby complementing and expanding theories on goal adjustment.
PMID: 26412011 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]
Great expectations? Pre-transplant quality of life expectations and distress after kidney transplantation: a prospective study.
![]() |
Related Articles |
Great expectations? Pre-transplant quality of life expectations and distress after kidney transplantation: a prospective study.
Br J Health Psychol. 2014 Nov;19(4):823-38
Authors: Schulz T, Niesing J, Homan van der Heide JJ, Westerhuis R, Ploeg RJ, Ranchor AV
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Previous research suggests that prior to kidney transplantation, patients overestimate their post-transplant quality of life (QoL). The current study aimed to corroborate these findings, identify determinants of QoL overestimation, examine its association with subsequent distress, and clarify the role of optimism.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study.
METHODS: Physical, psychological, and social QoL expectations, actual QoL, and distress (GHQ-12) of participants (56% male) were prospectively assessed before (T0; n = 228) and 3 (T1; n = 149), 6 (T2; n = 146), and 12 (T3; n = 114) months after successful transplantation.
RESULTS: Patients who were treated with haemodialysis before transplantation reported greater physical QoL overestimation than those who received treatment with peritoneal dialysis. Neither physical nor social QoL overestimation at T1 was prospectively associated with increased distress at T2 or T3. The interaction between optimism and social QoL overestimation at T1 (β = -.56, p < .001) for distress at T2 was significant, with patients low in optimism experiencing more distress after QoL overestimation.
CONCLUSIONS: QoL overestimation is not associated with subsequent distress. Findings suggest that patients low in optimism are more vulnerable to distress following QoL overestimation.
STATEMENT OF CONTRIBUTION: What is already known on this subject? Kidney transplantation improves patients’ quality of life. Prior to kidney transplantation, patients overestimate the scale of this improvement. What does this study add? Quality of life overestimation is not associated with subsequent distress. When optimism is low, kidney transplant recipients experience higher distress following quality of life overestimation.
PMID: 24330416 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]
Posted in Br J Health Psychol
Leave a comment
Sweet and sour after renal transplantation: a qualitative study about the positive and negative consequences of renal transplantation.
Related Articles
Sweet and sour after renal transplantation: a qualitative study about the positive and negative consequences of renal transplantation.
Br J Health Psychol. 2014 Sep;19(3):580-91
Authors: Schipper K, … Continue reading
Dispositional optimism in adolescents with cancer: differential associations of optimism and pessimism with positive and negative aspects of well-being.
Related Articles
Dispositional optimism in adolescents with cancer: differential associations of optimism and pessimism with positive and negative aspects of well-being.
Br J Health Psychol. 2013 Sep;18(3):474-89
Authors: Sulk… Continue reading
Psychological distress in couples dealing with colorectal cancer: gender and role differences and intracouple correspondence.
Related Articles
Psychological distress in couples dealing with colorectal cancer: gender and role differences and intracouple correspondence.
Br J Health Psychol. 2004 Nov;9(Pt 4):465-78
Authors: Tuinstra J, Hagedoorn M, Van S… Continue reading
Relationship satisfaction in women: a longitudinal case-control study about the role of breast cancer, personal assertiveness, and partners’ relationship-focused coping.
Related Articles
Relationship satisfaction in women: a longitudinal case-control study about the role of breast cancer, personal assertiveness, and partners’ relationship-focused coping.
Br J Health Psychol. 2008 Nov;13(Pt 4):737-54
… Continue reading
Failing in spousal caregiving: The ‘identity-relevant stress’ hypothesis to explain sex differences in caregiver distress.
Related Articles
Failing in spousal caregiving: The ‘identity-relevant stress’ hypothesis to explain sex differences in caregiver distress.
Br J Health Psychol. 2002 Nov;7(Part 4):481-494
Authors: Hagedoorn M, Sanderman R, Buun… Continue reading
Cognitive adaptation: a comparison of cancer patients and healthy references.
Related Articles
Cognitive adaptation: a comparison of cancer patients and healthy references.
Br J Health Psychol. 2003 Sep;8(Pt 3):303-18
Authors: Stiegelis HE, Hagedoorn M, Sanderman R, van der Zee KI, Buunk BP, van den Berg… Continue reading